Illustrative example — fictional data
AI Corner Coaching
A separate fictional example, not Enduro or Bathurst Shootout results. Both laps use the same apex, section start and exit measurement point. All figures and line observations are invented.
Sample AI analysis
Flowing right-hander · Where am I losing time?
The sample driver takes 8.800 s through this 220 m section; the fictional reference takes 8.550 s — a 0.250 s difference. The driver brakes 10 m later, but carries braking 10 m closer to the apex, reaches a lower minimum speed (78 vs 80 km/h), and starts throttle 20 m further past the apex.
The early apex and exit steering correction in the sample line leave less room to unwind the steering. Together with the later brake release, that can delay a smooth return to throttle. Exit speed is 109 vs 116 km/h. This illustrates why braking later is not automatically faster; these two examples do not prove which change caused the difference.
Prepared sample content · no live AI call. Reference values are comparisons, not targets. Stay within available grip, circuit rules and conditions.
AI Race Engineer
Ask about your racing
About these answers
Prepared answers based on the demo data. Members get answers generated from their own sessions.
How did my last race go?
Race Engineer · sample
- Fictional State Series Round 4: best lap 1:10.412 on lap 4 at Queensland Raceway — Switchback, 0.623 s quicker than Round 3 qualifying.
- The flying-lap spread is 0.568 s, excluding the out lap.
- Lap 2 (1:10.980) is your slowest flying lap. Compare it with lap 4 and your notes; lap times alone do not identify the cause.